Comments on: Debate on Paranormal Regulation continues… http://www.entities-r-us.com/entitiesblog/debate-on-paranormal-regulation-continues/ Paranormal Humor for the Ghost Hunter's Soul. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:48:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Joseph J. Andrasi http://www.entities-r-us.com/entitiesblog/debate-on-paranormal-regulation-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-7597 Joseph J. Andrasi Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:55:54 +0000 http://www.entities-r-us.com/?p=2360#comment-7597 OOP! sorry--that was LOGISTICS OOP! sorry–that was LOGISTICS

]]> By: Joseph J. Andrasi http://www.entities-r-us.com/entitiesblog/debate-on-paranormal-regulation-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-7596 Joseph J. Andrasi Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:54:44 +0000 http://www.entities-r-us.com/?p=2360#comment-7596 Nathan has some valid points--but we do need to start somewhere and though we are only in the discussion phase--it is a beginning. The log are going to be mind boggling but we need to keep moving forward. Nathan has some valid points–but we do need to start somewhere and though we are only in the discussion phase–it is a beginning. The log are going to be mind boggling but we need to keep moving forward.

]]> By: deonna kelli sayed http://www.entities-r-us.com/entitiesblog/debate-on-paranormal-regulation-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-7591 deonna kelli sayed Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:26:52 +0000 http://www.entities-r-us.com/?p=2360#comment-7591 I think Tj isn't talking about policing procedures or methodologies. There isn't a way yet to standardize these things. But I believe she is suggesting having some way for clients and teams to know if a group is professional, ethical, and isn't causing drama in the community. This is more about ethics than "methods." I think Tj isn’t talking about policing procedures or methodologies. There isn’t a way yet to standardize these things. But I believe she is suggesting having some way for clients and teams to know if a group is professional, ethical, and isn’t causing drama in the community. This is more about ethics than “methods.”

]]> By: Tj http://www.entities-r-us.com/entitiesblog/debate-on-paranormal-regulation-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-7590 Tj Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:11:13 +0000 http://www.entities-r-us.com/?p=2360#comment-7590 I agree with you actually... Again, we're attempting to apply physical laws to the non-physical. There is only so much "policing" we can do. Certifications to specialize areas of the field might be good, if only to give clients piece of mind. All in all, are we really that bad off? Tj I agree with you actually… Again, we’re attempting to apply physical laws to the non-physical. There is only so much “policing” we can do. Certifications to specialize areas of the field might be good, if only to give clients piece of mind.

All in all, are we really that bad off?

Tj

]]> By: Nathan http://www.entities-r-us.com/entitiesblog/debate-on-paranormal-regulation-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-7574 Nathan Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:56:36 +0000 http://www.entities-r-us.com/?p=2360#comment-7574 Regulations, regulations... I don't like regulations in paranormal field simple because you can't regulate something that can't be even explained. How can you regulate something if you don't know what should be regulated - I mean, the way people investigate is a direct result of their own system of beliefs and approach - some people prefer scientific point of view, others more occult one - how to create regulation system that both sides will like, hmm? Regulations, regulations… I don’t like regulations in paranormal field simple because you can’t regulate something that can’t be even explained. How can you regulate something if you don’t know what should be regulated – I mean, the way people investigate is a direct result of their own system of beliefs and approach – some people prefer scientific point of view, others more occult one – how to create regulation system that both sides will like, hmm?

]]>